|
Current
Issue:
Volume
2, Issue 2
Figures:
Percentages
of Intermarriage in 1895
Percentages
of Intermarriage in 1900
Percentages
of Intermarriage in 1905
Male
Percentage vs. Female Percentage of Ethnic Groups Marrying in 1895
Male
Percentage vs. Female Percentage of Ethnic Groups Marrying in 1900
GCR
Archives
Kevin McGrath,
Editor mcgrath@primaryresearch.org
|
Intra-
and Inter- Marriage Between Ethnic Groups in Beverly in 1895, 1900, and
1905
By
Sarah Coffey
Intermarriage
between ethnic groups around the turn of the century depended on many
factors. Ethnic groups themselves can be defined as having these six characteristics:
common language, common heredity, common religion, common geographic locale,
common behavioral norms and a common set of surnames. These characteristics
help a certain ethnic group maintain its distinctiveness. It is this certain
distinctiveness that ethnic groups hope to maintain, especially by discouraging
marriage to outsiders. Thus, intermarriage between ethnic groups is more
likely to occur if the availability of partners inside the ethnic group
is low.
Several factors determine the reasons for in-group marriages and outside
group marriages. Not only do ethnic groups want to maintain their distinctiveness
by intra-marriage, but it is also often their way of maintaining the same
social rank. These class boundaries are often just as strong as the ethnic
boundaries, so that, for example, the commonly middle-class Swedes are
less likely to marry the commonly working-class Italians. Formal religious
barriers are also imposed on members of certain ethnic groups. Most churches
greatly discouraged marriage to anyone outside their membership. Up until
the late 1960's and 70's the Roman Catholic Church forbade their priests
to perform inter-religious marriage ceremonies unless the non-Catholic
partner promised to raise the children as Catholics, and as long as the
Catholic partner promised to try to convert their non-Catholic partner.
(The Mennonites still threaten to excommunicate anyone who marries outside
the faith.) Until 1967 when the law was deemed unconstitutional there
was a formal legal barrier on any interracial marriage. There is also
an informal barrier that keeps ethnic groups from inter-marrying, though
not as strong as the aforementioned barriers. The parents of the bride
and groom can determine through either disinheritance or just grant disapproval
whenever their children marry outside the group. [1]
In Donald Cole's study of the marriages of immigrants to Lawrence, Massachusetts
between 1845 and 1921 he found that immigrants would marry for security
more than anything. In the years of "the shanty Irish and decades
of despair" marriages were more frequent than in the years when there
was more hope. He also found that immigrants overall were marrying more
frequently than the natives. One factor may be that in a large city an
immigrant did not dare stay single. Security is something that also determines
intermarriages. Though it was always common for an immigrant to look for
a partner within their own ethnic group, even with the smallest of groups,
it was seen that they were in-group marrying even more so in the days
when security was needed. When there was hope and less of a need for security,
they married less, and when they did marry there was more of a chance
for intermarriage. He also found that when the group's religious or physical
appearances were more different than most Americans, (as in the Irish
and southeastern Europeans) intermarriage was practically non-existent.
Immigrants either came to the US with a spouse of the same ethnic group
or married a native, but rarely married immigrants of different ethnic
backgrounds. If he or she was able, a member of any ethnic group would
more likely marry within their group no matter what. [2]
According to the City of Beverly's marriage records, 120 marriages took
place in 1895. Groups with the largest amount of members marrying were
those from the United States, Ireland, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick.
Immigrants from New Brunswick were the ones with the highest rate or intermarriage,
though Nova Scotians were not too far behind. Sixty-six percent of males
born in New Brunswick took wives born in the United States and 33% took
wives born in Nova Scotia. Of the people from New Brunswick marrying only
40% of them were female and all of those took partners from the United
State. The large average age difference of 10 years between the woman
and men from New Brunswick may be a factor in this high rate of intermarriage.
Although the amount of members from the opposite sex marrying from Nova
Scotia was close to equal, 57.1% of the men were taking American wives
and 66.6% of the women were taking partners from an outside group. In
the other 3 groups of this list, members from the United States, Ireland
and Prince Edward Island were not as likely to marry outside of their
group. Of course, it is only logical that Americans stay more within their
group since of the 120 marriages that took place that year, 85 of them
(70%) were between American couples. With a male to female ratio of 3:2,
only 44% of Irish males took American wives and 16.6% of the Irish females
took an American husband. The Irish married into other groups and in the
case of Irish and American intermarriage the American partners surname
usually hinted at Irish decent. Of the four Prince Edward Island natives
(2 males and 2 females) who married in that year, all married each other
with no incidence of intermarriage. In other cases of ethnic marriage
(such as those from Finland, Sweden and Italy) they were either the only
member of that group of marrying age, (so they had to marry outside the
group) or there were two members of that group, each of the opposite sex,
who married each other. For example, the marriage records show only one
Canadian couple, one Finnish couple and one Swedish couple.[3]
Five years later, the amount of marriages rose to 167. This time, only
59% of marriages were between American couples. The same groups still
have the most members marrying. Both New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island
had the same amount of men and women marrying (see Figure
5) and interestingly enough, they both failed to have any in-group
marriage whatsoever. Though there was the same percentage of male Nova
Scotians marrying Americans as in 1895, they were also now marrying French
Canadians, English and those from Prince Edward Island. For the females
from this area, 65% took American husbands. There was also a marriage
with an Irish man and another with a Swedish man. Of all the groups, the
Nova Scotians were the only ones that had a very close male to female
ratio but still married more outside of their group than inside. [4]
With the number of marriages and women increasing, the Irish had an even
higher in-group marriage rate than in the previous 5 years. There were
no Irish males marrying American females at all. In fact there was only
one marriage outside the group where the Irish males were concerned and
that was one with a Nova Scotian partner (see Figure
2). With the male to female ratio being 1:4, there were now more Irish
females marrying outside the group, 33.3% of them taking American husbands.
With an increase of French Canadians marrying and a male to female ratio
of 4:1, there was no in-group marrying at all among this group, unlike
in 1895. Of the 4 Canadian males who married, all took American wives
and the one Canadian girl who married also marred an American. The Swedes
also changed from having its members all marry within the group to having
them all intermarry. Here the male to female ratio was 1:2, yet both female
Swedes married Americans and the male married a Nova Scotian. [5]
In
1900 a new group, the Germans, showed up in the marriage records. The
records show that there were only two marriages in this year involving
Germans, both being intermarriages. The two men who married in this year
both married American girls. In this year we see that not only is there
a higher rate of intermarriage, but that these marriages that once only
had certain groups intermarrying with certain groups, are becoming more
evenly distributed among other groups as well. [6]
The number of marriages within a year rose dramatically in 1905 to 2,107.
At this point about 91.2% of Beverly's eligible population were marrying.
But the patterns seemed to still be the same. Other than Americans, the
Irish were the largest group marrying and most of these occurred within
the group. If an Irish male did not choose a partner from the group, they
were most likely to take an American or Nova Scotian wife. The amount
of Irish women marrying was exactly the same as the amount of men and
both had the same amount of out-of-group marriages. With the Irish, both
sexes had 10.5% taking American partners, and 5.2% taking Nova Scotian
partners. The groups with the most intermarriage were Americans and Nova
Scotians. The Americans tended to be more diverse in intermarrying, as
the males took wives from places such as Sweden and England and the females
married the Irish and Italians. Fifty percent of the males from Nova Scotia
intermarried, while 55% of the females from Nova Scotia were married outside
the group. With a male-to-female ratio of 8:9, the women from Nova Scotia
tended to marry outside the group more. Recorded was one marriage between
a Nova Scotian female and Swedish male, and another marriage between a
Nova Scotian female and a German male. Members from the other Canadian
provinces still tended to marry people from their area. In both female
and male cases from New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island all intermarriages
that took place were with Americans, Nova Scotians or French-Canadians.
Male immigrants that were marrying in the year such as Italians, Russians
and Germans married women from Nova Scotia or Beverly, or else they would
marry a partner from their own group. The numbers of marriages that include
those groups are small. Figure 3 shows that though
there seems to be more intermarriage activity this year, the percentage
of intermarriage seems to be lower than any other years; this is probably
due to the fact that the number of people marrying increases, so though
there were more outside marriages there were still a lot more inside as
well. [7]
From the 3 years cited, several patterns appeared. In the case of the
Irish, few intermarriages took place. This is probably due to the fact
of the large availability of both Irish men and women. Also, because the
majority of them were Catholic, the formal religious rules of Cathlocism
were still strong. Thus when there were incidences of intermarriages,
they were with Americans and Nova Scotians all of the time. The Americans
were most often of Irish ancestry and the Nova Scotians were probably
descended from Irish Catholics. The Nova Scotians and Americans were the
most diverse group when it came to intermarriages. These groups, along
with Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick groups, probably had the least
prominent ethnic boundaries, and so it was more easier for them to marry
into other groups. Many of the Americans marrying were second or third
generations of other ethnic groups, thus making them more acceptable to
marry if intermarriage was the case. The few marriages in the other ethnic
groups may be due to the fact that there was little availability of partners
from the particular group, giving many the choice of not marrying at all.
Very few married into other groups as an alternative. So, in the case
of groups such as the Italians, Swedish, and Germans, there were either
very few in-group marriages, very few out of group marriages, or no marriages
from the group at all. An example of this would be that of the Italians.
During the three years recorded there were only two marriages involving
Italians, both men. An explanation could be that during the early 1900's
Italian men were coming from Italy to Beverly to help build the United
Shoe Machinery Corporation. Hardly any Italian women were in Beverly during
that time, so many men went back to Italy to bring back their future wives,
or did not marry at all. Few were found intermarrying. This strongly proves
the original hypothesis, that the amount of intermarriages depends greatly
on the availability of partners inside and outside the group.
There
were also other factors that seemed to determine the rate of intermarriage
in Beverly. The religious and the relative barriers that surround the
group were not always prominent. For example the Nova Scotians, as I stated
before, had more opportunities to intermarry. On the other hand, when
such barriers as language and religious were in effect, as in the case
of Germans and Italians, more intra-marriages took place. Had there been
more time for research, other factors such as social class and occupations
might have been considered. However, this research gives an idea of the
kind of interaction that took place between these immigrants to Beverly
in the early 1900's.
Notes
[1]
Stephen Thernstrom, Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups.
(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980): 513-14.
[2]
Donald B. Cole, Immigrant City: Lawrence, Massachusetts, 1845-1921
(Chapel Hill, N.C. : University of North Carolina Press, 1963): 120-24.
[3]
City of Beverly. City Clerk. Marriage Records, 1895. Beverly City Hall.
[4]
City of Beverly. City Clerk. Marriage Records, 1900. Beverly City Hall.
[5]
ibid.
[6]
ibid.
[7]
City of Beverly. City Clerk. Marriage Records, 1905. Beverly City Hall.
Thernstrom,
Stephen. Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.
|
|