Study Guide
Poverty and Progress : Social
Mobility in a Nineteenth Century City, by Stephan Thernstrom.
- How was the central cultural theme of
the promise of social mobility manifested in America around
the 1800s?
- How did the function of the ideology
of mobility supply the citizens of 19th century America
with a scheme for comprehending and accommodating themselves
to a new social and economic order?
- How did the passionate intensity of
19th century mobility ideology play a strategic role
in the evolution of American social attitudes?
- In which ways were the ideology of mobility
in America radically different form the Old World?
- How did the doctrine of the "open
race" sanction sharp differences in wealth and social status?
- In what two traits did the secret of
success lay?
A)
B)
- The central injunction of the mobility
creed to the working man was what advice?
- What was the explanation for people
being poor?
- List and explain the two answers of
what constituted success.
A)
B)
- Why does the story of "local boy
make good" hold in central place in the ideology of mobility?
- Why was the fluid social structure of
Newburyport considered the quanantee of stability and prosperity?
- What were some of the aspects of a more
humane interpretation of mobility ideology in attitudes toward
the problem of poverty?
- What was the "just deserts"
theory of poverty?
- What two sets of conditions were necessary
for genuine equal opportunities for all people?
A)
B)
- What did reformers in mid century Newburyport
feel was the most important agency of improvement?
B) Why?
- Explain the distinction between intra
generational and inter generational mobility.
- What occupational class in Newburyport was
in the lowest social stratum?
- Why do the terms social status and social
class raise complex and disputed problems of definition?
- The most common form of mobility experienced
by the ordinary laborers of 19th century Newburyport
was-
- What two chief social trends of 19th
century America appear in Newburyport?
A)
B)
- What are some of the reasons that would
explain why a laborer would migrate from Newburyport?
- Why would it be highly unlikely for
the geographic mobility of these laborers to have any effect
on their opportunities for upward social mobility?
- Why is migration a selective process?
- Thernstrom defines occupational mobility
as a move form one to another of what four broad categories?
- Why is the superior ranking of non-manual
occupations incontestable?
- What types of occupations were at the
top of the manual-laboring group?
- Why was the common laborer at the mercy
of the harsh uncertainties of the casual labor market?
- What three criteria would distinguish
a semi skilled job from an unskilled job?
A)
B)
C)
- How does a communitys occupational
structure determine the range of occupational mobility opportunities
available?
- Were there any changes in the main outlines
of the Newburyport occupational structure between 1850 and 1880?
- How is the rate of persistence of a
group for a particular decade defined?
- From 1850 1860 upward mobility was
restricted almost entirely to what two occupational categories?
A)
B)
- Why were occupational opportunities
for the immigrants form rural New England and abroad who arrived
in Newburyport after 1850 less favorable?
- Did Yankee workmen climb into higher
status occupations more easily than immigrant laborers in the
period from 1850 1880?
- How was the shrinking of opportunities
in the semi skilled occupations intimately connected with the
changing ethnic composition of the Newburyport laboring class?
General Conclusions About the Mobility Patterns
of Common Laborers in Newburyport in the 1850 1880
Period
- What evidence shows the communitys
unskilled laboring force to be extremely fluid?
- What evidence shows that variations
in the occupational opportunities was not closely related to
variations in the flow of migrants from the city?
- What evidence shows that a common workman
who remained in Newburyport during these years had only a slight
chance of rising into a middle class occupation?
- Were politics or religion important
channels for immigrant upward mobility in Newburyport?
B) Why?
- What evidence shows the lack of opportunity
for laborers to enter skilled manual occupations?
- The opportunity for the laborer to take
the modest step upward into the semi skilled category varied
in what two significant ways?
A)
B)
- What is the difference in computing
intra generational mobility and inter generational
mobility?
- What evidence suggests that laborers
sons did not inherit the occupation of their fathers?
- Although a certain number of laborers
sons gained a foothold in the white-collar world after 1860
what type of occupation was a more important source of upward
mobility?
- What effect do the role of ethnic differences
and the influence of geographic mobility have on the process
of inter generational mobility?
A) Role of ethnic differences -
B) Influence of geographic mobility -
- List the six main conclusions of the career
patterns of Newburyport laborers and their sons in the 1850
1880 period
A)
B)
C)
D)
E)
F)
|